FAITHQuantum Spacetime Strategy OS Institute
日本語
Back

Institute  /  M&A Human Due Diligence

Read the counterparty's decision-maker before you sign.

M&AHuman due diligenceKey personsPartner assessmentCounterparty creditExecutive assessment

Due diligence exhausts the financials, the legal and the tax. Every statement and every contract can be read to the last line. What stays unread is the person deciding on the other side. That territory has long been left to one word — “chemistry.” The Quantum Spacetime Strategy OS turns that word into coordinates: who truly decides, and in which phase their judgement will turn — resolved before signing. Person risk and timing risk — the two exposures no balance sheet shows — made visible in advance.

Make fortune a matter of design. Raise the probability of success.
Success is defined by the client — and the decision is designed from that definition.

Where Mismatch Occurs

Three things stay unread

01

The decision-maker's structure

The title on the organisation chart and the person who actually moves the decision are often two different people.

02

Post-merger chemistry

Buyer and seller, parent and subsidiary. Friction after integration surfaces in the pairing of the two.

03

The timing of the contract

Is the counterparty in a phase of growth or of preparation? On identical terms, the moment of signing changes the result.

Financial due diligence reads the past through the numbers. Legal due diligence reads the rights and obligations written into the contracts. Both are rigorous, and both rightly anchor any transaction. Yet both read facts already on paper. What takes effect after integration is the structure of the counterparty's decision-maker and the timing still ahead. That question needs a third lens, alongside the financial and the legal — one built for the transaction itself.

The Coordinate

Put the decision on coordinates

Conventional frameworks plot a decision on a single line from past to future. The OS adds three coordinates — person, time and space. Eight systems are built in as the rules that compute them.

Person

Structure

The counterparty decision-maker's calibre, pattern of judgement and the way their strength comes out.

Time

Timing

A phase of growth or a phase of preparation. This layer sets the timing of signing and integration year by year.

Space

Position

Headquarters or regional base, home market or overseas, existing business or new field. This layer adds where each party stands.

On these coordinates, what was called chemistry becomes the overlap of person, pairing and time — a non-linear overlap in which several axes act at once. M&A and partnership are both the act of choosing a counterparty, and a moment, within it.

Input

One input: date of birth and sex

InputDate of birth and sex — nothing more
AnalysisOne core analysis, cross-validated across up to eight systems
IntegrationPerson × Time × Space, converged into five axes
OutputDecision-maker structure · post-merger chemistry · contract timing

Career history, questionnaires and interview impressions stay outside the input. With nothing resting on self-report, every candidate stands on the same standard. The same input yields the same structure, whoever runs it.

Output

What the decision receives

Decision-maker structurePost-merger chemistryContract timingKey-person durabilityNegotiation phases

The decision-maker's structure is shown as a pattern of judgement and the way strength comes out. Post-merger chemistry is output as the structure of complement and friction between two parties — buyer and seller, parent and subsidiary. Contract timing is laid out year by year as phases of growth and phases of preparation. Key-person durability appears as a timeline of how long that person will carry the role. Negotiation phases are shown as the windows in which judgement moves freely and those in which it sets.

Human due diligence, inside the negotiation deadline. With no step waiting on the counterparty's cooperation, the analysis runs on the deal's own timeline.

Research Cases

The same question, read in history

How this question played out in the historical record — traced in the paid Research Cases.

Scope of Application

Scope

The OS supplies the structural reference that sharpens a decision. M&A, partnerships and counterparty assessment all run on the same coordinates. The final decision rests with the client, alongside professional financial, legal and tax advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Questions on M&A Human Due Diligence

How does this differ from financial and legal due diligence?

Financial due diligence reads the past in the numbers; legal due diligence reads the rights and obligations in the contracts. This analysis addresses the structure of the counterparty's decision-maker and the timing still ahead. The subjects differ, and they work best together. In investment terms, it is alternative data on the people behind the deal.

Can it be done without the counterparty's cooperation?

Yes. The input — date of birth and sex — is available from public information. No interview or questionnaire is required.

Can several acquisition or partnership candidates be compared?

Yes. The corporate Spacetime Databank sets executive candidates, partners and investment targets on one standard, making overlaps and gaps visible.

Does it inform the timing of the contract?

Yes. On identical terms, whether the counterparty is in a phase of growth or of preparation changes how integration begins. This is laid out year by year.

Can it be used in credit management?

Yes. The Spacetime Databank is designed as the third perspective, after financial indicators and credit information. Its developer holds the CICP, the professional qualification in international credit.

How is this different from fortune-telling?

Conventional frameworks plot a decision on a single line from past to future. This OS adds the coordinates of person, time and space and computes them under fixed rules. The same input yields the same structure, whoever runs it.

Do you need the subject's name?

No. A report can be commissioned under a case code, with date of birth and sex alone. In that case the institute never receives the name and never holds it.

Will the result be the same whoever runs it?

Yes. The computed classification is independent of the analyst. Every analysis records the OS version and the database version: same input, same versions — same structure.

Contact

Discuss a decision with the Strategy OS Institute

We welcome inquiries in English.

Contact the Institute